The Right to the City for Companion Species: Biopolitical Interventions Toward Street Animals in Turkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2025.250Keywords:
companian species, biopolitics, therighttothecityfordogs, street dogs, animal rightsAbstract
This study explores how street dogs in Turkey have been problematized in public discourse, focusing on their exclusion through the lens of the “right to the city.” In recent years, dogs have been framed as public safety threats, leading to securitization and species-based marginalization. The study uses three key concepts—Haraway’s companion species, Lefebvre’s right to the city, and Foucault’s biopolitics—to examine how urban animals are governed and perceived. It argues that dogs, like humans, are entitled to urban space and should be included in debates about urban rights and justice. By challenging the question “What are dogs doing in the city?”, the study expands urban theory to include non-human life. It ultimately calls for a reconsideration of human-animal relations and urban ethics, offering a more inclusive understanding of the city as a shared space shaped by diverse forms of life.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Onur Özkan, Gökberk Uray

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All manuscripts which are submitted to the REFLEKTIF Journal of Social Sciences should not be published, accepted and submitted for publication elsewhere.
In case an article is accepted for publication it is allowed to combine the article with other researches, to conduct a new research on the article or to make different arrangements on condition that the same license is used including the commercial purpose.
As an author of an article published in REFLEKTIF Journal of Social Sciences you retain the copyright of your article and you are free to reproduce and disseminate your work.

